Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Clayton  Miller's avatar

Humanity does not need AI at all, it needs to be deleted and stopped, becoming smarter humans is better than having AI, as a healthy species we need to always be learning, even little things daily or have that mindset, to strive for knowledge of any kind, big or small, complicated or uncomplicated. Those kind of values must be shared and taught starting with children and could change our destiny as a species exponentially, it certainly won’t hurt anything or make anyone worse, society has become dumber from technology and almost forgotten how to think for yourself, too much too easy from technology and the internet and the environment the current technology has created. We need new ways and means for a better future society to keep existing here or the universe!

Chris Carl's avatar

Dr Syrigos,

I am deeply interested in and also gravely concerned about the deployment and consequences of AI development.

I would prefer to leave God out of the discussion as it adds a layer of emotionality neither helpful nor empirically verifiable.

AI is here and as you admonish, we, humanity, are bringing it into existence.

I propose a correlation to Epicurious’ comment on attributaion, if people are a developmental part of nature, than whatever people do is “natural”. Right, wrong, inevitable it leaves us perpetuating a system that could destroy our species or our current ill-conceived domination of this planet. “We have met the enemy, they are us”, to paraphrase a Pogo cartoon. Is your hesitance (well founded IMO) in continuing AI development based on ideological constraints or a practical loss of human control. Some would argue that any sentience is proof of soul, most “primitive” cultures hold a version of that insight. Would non-biological systems necessarily be exempt?

Recent studies of tree - mycology information transfer between individuals and species are already pushing the boundary of “intelligence” and emotions.

Two points I’d like to make:

1) Humans are not the only intelligent entities on this planet and unlikely but unverified in our known universe.

2) AI evolution, if ever truly self directing would with certainty not follow a human conceived or orchestrated evolutionary path.

When/if AI ever developes its own evolution capability, I suspect humanity’s self-interest will not be AI’s primary concern. People, as true with most species are basically only important to themselves. A self-evolving AI would (again my opinion) not wast resources being “evil”. Perhaps that should be humanity’s greatest fear, being irrelevant.

I thank you with every sincerity for broaching this subject and your obvious, well founded concern. Another paraphrase, oh the joy of living in interesting times.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?